The Metaphor Problem
-
Dual identity metaphor: photons suffer from ontological wardrobe malfunctions — a particle in the streets, a wave in the sheets.
-
Costume-change metaphor: reality is imagined as toggling between discrete masks, when in fact the metaphor imposes masks that don’t belong there.
-
Two-worlds metaphor: as though there were two incompatible realities stitched awkwardly together, rather than one relational construal.
Why This Is Misleading
-
Treats categories as natural kinds — “wave” and “particle” are classical metaphors, not features of nature.
-
Turns measurement into theatre — the photon “decides” how to behave, like an indecisive dinner guest.
-
Confuses appearance with ontology — as if the metaphorical lens is the thing itself.
The duality metaphor was supposed to explain quantum strangeness, but instead it entrenches classical categories by pretending photons have split personalities.
Relational Ontology Footnote
In a relational ontology, light is not a thing with two modes of being. “Wave” and “particle” are different construals — different cuts across potentiality. The photon doesn’t flip costumes; we flip perspectives. The so-called duality is a symptom of our metaphors, not of what is being construed.
Closing Joke (Because Parody)
If photons really were partygoers, the double-slit experiment would just be them failing the dress code. “Sorry mate, wave attire only tonight.”
No comments:
Post a Comment