Problem / Misleading Aspect: This metaphor projects human notions of calm or moral balance onto physical systems. It implies intention or desirable outcomes, obscuring the dynamic, relational processes that actually define equilibrium. Equilibrium is not serene; it is the state in which relational potentials are maximally accessible and redistributed according to constraints.
Relational Ontology Correction: Equilibrium is a dynamic relational state, not a static or morally “balanced” condition. It emerges from interactions among particles, energy flows, and constraints, without preference or design.
Parody / Conceptual Highlight: Taken literally, one might imagine stars practising yoga, molecules meditating to maintain zen, or entire galaxies attending mindfulness retreats. The humour exposes the conceptual danger: the balance metaphor misleadingly anthropomorphises statistical physics.
No comments:
Post a Comment