The Selfish Gene

Richard Dawkins’ “selfish gene” metaphor has entered popular culture as if genes were tiny agents with motives, desires, and agendas. They “want” to replicate, “compete” with other genes, and even “sabotage” rivals.

Charming — but deeply misleading.

---

The Metaphor Problem

• Selfishness implies intention and consciousness.

• Genes do not possess goals or awareness; they are sequences of nucleotides constrained by relational dynamics in cells, organisms, and populations.

• The metaphor invites us to imagine evolution as personalised drama at the molecular level, rather than the emergent patterns of interaction it truly is.

---

Why This Is Misleading

1. Anthropomorphises DNA — statistical correlations become intentional acts.

2. Obscures relational causality — gene expression and phenotype arise from interactions among genes, proteins, cells, and environments.

3. Encourages teleological thinking — genes are not agents “trying” to survive; they are patterns instantiated within constraints.

The “selfish gene” metaphor, while rhetorically vivid, hides the distributed and relational nature of evolution behind a veil of anthropomorphic storytelling.

---

Relational Ontology Footnote

From a relational perspective, a gene is not a tiny agent but a node in a network of potential actualisations. Replication is not a goal-driven act but the outcome of systemic alignment across temporal and environmental contexts. The notion of selfishness is a metaphor imposed on statistical patterning.

---

Closing Joke (Because Parody)

If genes truly were selfish, your DNA would hold grudges, demand ransom for cell division, and send passive-aggressive messages to your mitochondria.